The molecule
Urolithin A can be produced by gut microbes from dietary ellagitannins. Eating pomegranate is not a standardized urolithin A dose; people differ in conversion.
CATALOG INGREDIENT · RESEARCH REVIEW
Urolithin A has encouraging findings in selected muscle-fatigue and strength tests. The larger story is mixed: important primary outcomes were null, and the pooled walking estimate is still uncertain. This is a neutral review of a listed catalog ingredient, not a recommendation to take it.
See the measured resultsIngredient and formulation research, not proof of finished-product results. Reviewed 10 September 2026.
THE RESULTS, IN PLAIN ENGLISH
A before-and-after improvement can reflect repeat testing, behavior changes or other influences. The placebo comparison is what helps isolate the supplement’s effect. In the older-adult trial, that comparison was not significant.
Change in six-minute walking distance, metres
Difference in walking-distance change versus placebo, metres
UNDERSTANDING THE INGREDIENT
Urolithin A can be produced by gut microbes from dietary ellagitannins. Eating pomegranate is not a standardized urolithin A dose; people differ in conversion.
Mitophagy is the recycling of damaged mitochondria. Laboratory and human biomarker findings make this an interesting target, but do not establish longer life or reverse aging.
Several key trials used sponsor-supplied urolithin A, including Mitopure. A different particle size, capsule or supplier requires evidence of equivalence before borrowing a branded formulation’s results.
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE HUMAN RESEARCH
Positive findings, null results and reviews are shown together. Open any study for the population, dose, duration and limitations. Every summary is available without JavaScript.
LIU · 2022 · RANDOMIZED TRIAL
Isolated muscle-fatigue tests improved at two months. The primary walking and ATP-production outcomes did not significantly beat placebo. [1]
Read the source · Primary full text
SINGH · 2022 · ATLAS TRIAL
Hamstring strength favored Mitopure. Cycling peak power, the prespecified primary outcome, did not. [2]
Read the source · Primary full text
ZHAO · 2024 · RANDOMIZED TRIAL
Selected isometric and repetition outcomes were encouraging; bench-press and squat maximums were not clearly better than placebo. [3]
Read the source · Primary abstract
DAO · 2026 · SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
The latest reviewed synthesis rates the walking evidence as low certainty. [4]
Read the source · Systematic review, full text
This is a selected evidence review, not an exhaustive systematic review of every possible use. A review can contain the trials shown above; those are not additional independent experiments. A p-value describes statistical evidence, not the size or importance of a benefit.
FROM THE STUDY TO THE LABEL
Current catalog labels are product information, not independent proof of efficacy, identity, potency or bioequivalence. No finished Neurogan product below was the intervention in the cited trials.
Supplement Facts: 700 mg urolithin A per one-capsule serving.
Directions: Directions: one capsule daily. Label lists vegetable cellulose capsule as the other ingredient.
Research comparison: Not identified as Mitopure on the reviewed label. The key older-adult trial used 1,000 mg/day in softgels; matching ingredient name alone does not establish clinical equivalence.
Current product listing · Original label image

This is the label image linked by the live product record when reviewed on 10 September 2026.
Serving size and daily directions are listed separately. A dose similarity is not evidence that a different formula produces the same outcomes.
Labels and listings can change. Check the package you receive and discuss individual use with a qualified clinician.
Supplement Facts: 1,000 mg urolithin A per two-capsule serving.
Directions: Directions: two capsules daily, equivalent to 500 mg per capsule. The listing describes an ultra-micronized preparation.
Research comparison: The daily mass matches one research dose, not necessarily the research formulation. The label does not identify Mitopure. No product-specific trial or head-to-head absorption equivalence was identified.
Current product listing · Original label image

This is the label image linked by the live product record when reviewed on 10 September 2026.
Serving size and daily directions are listed separately. A dose similarity is not evidence that a different formula produces the same outcomes.
Labels and listings can change. Check the package you receive and discuss individual use with a qualified clinician.
SAFETY AND REALISTIC EXPECTATIONS
Short trials generally found acceptable tolerability and no clear excess of adverse events in their selected populations. They were not designed to exclude uncommon harms or establish years-long safety. Evidence is limited in pregnancy, breastfeeding, children and people with serious medical conditions. Medication-interaction data are incomplete. Discuss supplementation with a clinician rather than replacing exercise, adequate nutrition or prescribed treatment. Neither the regular nor Pro product is recommended by this review.
This page is educational, not a diagnosis, treatment plan or individualized dose recommendation. Do not stop prescribed treatment or replace established care on the basis of a biomarker result. “No significant difference” does not prove two treatments are equivalent, and “well tolerated” in a small trial does not rule out rare harms.
Bring the full ingredient list, medicines and health history to a clinician or pharmacist. In a blend, the safety question concerns every ingredient together, not only the name on the front label.
REFERENCES AND ACCESS
Links lead to primary publications or systematic reviews. Access limitations are stated rather than filled with assumed methods or outcomes. Product comparisons use the live product records and linked label images above.
An endurance signal, but no clear walking advantage. Access reviewed: Primary full text.
Open publication · Return to study summarySelected strength gains, not a successful primary endpoint. Access reviewed: Primary full text.
Open publication · Return to study summaryA small athlete trial is not a universal strength claim. Access reviewed: Primary abstract.
Open publication · Return to study summaryThe pooled walking estimate still includes no benefit. Access reviewed: Systematic review, full text.
Open publication · Return to study summary